Why I do not believe **IN** evolution

topic posted Mon, May 12, 2008 - 8:15 AM by  Krampus
I Am Evolution
www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php
by Holly Dunsworth


I believe evolution. It's easy. It's my life. I'm a paleoanthropologist. I study fossils of humans, apes and monkeys, and I teach college students about their place in nature.

Of course I believe evolution.

But that is different from believing in evolution.

To believe in something takes faith, trust, effort, strength. I need none of these things to believe evolution. It just is. My health is better because of medical research based on evolution. My genetic code is practically the same as a chimpanzee's. My bipedal feet walk on an earth full of fossil missing links. And when my feet tire, those fossils fuel my car.

To believe in something also implies hope. Hope of happiness, reward, forgiveness, eternal life. There is no hope wrapped up in my belief. Unless you count the hope that one day I'll discover the most beautifully complete fossil human skeleton ever found, with a label attached saying exactly what species it belonged to, what food it ate, how much it hunted, if it could speak, if it could laugh, if it could love and if it could throw a curveball. But this fantasy is not why I believe evolution — as if evolution is something I hope comes true.

After all the backyard bone collecting I did as a child, I managed to carve out a career where I get to ask the ultimate question on a daily basis: "Where did I come from and how?"

If our beliefs are important enough, we live our lives in service to them. That's how I feel about evolution. My role as a female Homo sapiens is to return each summer to Kenya, dig up fossils, and piece together our evolutionary history. Scanning the ground for weeks, hoping to find a single molar, or gouging out the side of a hill, one bucket of dirt at a time, I'm always in search of answers to questions shared by the whole human species. The experience deepens my understanding not just about what drives my life, but all our lives, where we came from. And the deeper I go, the more I understand that everything is connected. A bullfrog to a gorilla, a hummingbird to me, to you.

My belief is not immutable. It is constantly evolving with accumulating evidence, new knowledge and breakthrough discoveries. For example, within my lifetime, our history has expanded from being rooted 3 million years ago with the famous Lucy skeleton, to actually beginning over 6 million years ago with a cranium from Chad. The metamorphic nature of my belief is not at all like a traditional religious one; it's more like seeing is believing.

So I believe evolution.

I feel it. I breathe it. I listen to evolution, I observe it and I do evolution. I write, study, analyze, scrutinize and collect evolution. I am evolution.
posted by:
Krampus
  • Re: Why I do not believe **IN** evolution

    Mon, May 12, 2008 - 11:09 AM
    yay paleoanthropology!
    • Re: Why I do not believe **IN** evolution

      Mon, May 12, 2008 - 12:39 PM
      Yes, it's also important to distinguish between believing in something because you've been persuaded that it conforms to reality and believing in something because it agrees with your values.

      "Evolutionists" are often accused of displacing religion and replacing it with a cut-throat, dog-eat-dog morality. That's like suggesting that you believe in gravity because you revel in airplane crashes.

      Dawkins has a good line on this (paraphrasing): as a biologist, I am a Darwinian because it explains what's happening...as an ethicist, I am a strong ANTI-Darwinian because evolution is brutal and unconcerned with justice.
      • Creationist Libertarians

        Tue, May 13, 2008 - 7:21 PM
        <<Dawkins has a good line on this (paraphrasing): as a biologist, I am a Darwinian because it explains what's happening...as an ethicist, I am a strong ANTI-Darwinian because evolution is brutal and unconcerned with justice.>>

        That is an excellent point. There is no correlation between Darwin's theory of Evolution and social Darwinism 'dog eat dog' mentality. Personally I think that so called social Darwinism has more to do with the bizarre 'kill the poor' rationalizations of Thomas Malthus, and Malthusian theory.

        Strangely, I have noticed that those who defend 'Creationist' theory while attacking Evolution the most vehemently, paradoxically also happen to be those who support and expound upon the ideals of Malthusian theory and 'social Darwinism' when it comes to the war on the poor. Has anyone else noticed this? It's almost as though these 'Creationist Libertarians' thought that evolution didn't apply to other animals at all, but only applied to social and economic classes of people.

        Even Jesus was a socialist, who believed in helping out the poor.
        • Re: Creationist Libertarians

          Wed, May 14, 2008 - 6:49 AM
          >>>>>>Personally I think that so called social Darwinism has more to do with the bizarre 'kill the poor' rationalizations of Thomas Malthus, and Malthusian theory.


          You can only move from evolution to social darwinism via the bridge of Natural Law Theory.
          • Re: Creationist Libertarians

            Wed, May 14, 2008 - 9:01 AM
            I appreciate the distinction between believing that evolutionary theory explains many things and believing *in* evolution as if it were a dogma; however, the claims at the end of the piece----I breathe evolution, I am evolution, and so on---are goofy. I wonder if the author would also say, "I *AM* sexual reproduction." One hopes not.
            • Re: Creationist Libertarians

              Wed, May 14, 2008 - 9:39 AM
              Well, even if you add the proper syntax, the message doesn't really change. "I am a product of evolution" works as well as "I am a product of sexual reproduction". This writer was obviously not a poet or a grammar expert. It is worded in a goofy way. However, it doesn't change the point they were making.

Recent topics in "Atheists"